Killer wars create immigrants; let’s have more wars
by Jon Rappoport
March 29, 2017
Some, but not all, waves of immigrants result from wars that leave people helpless and terrified. They run, they flee, they emigrate to the West.
We must have more immigrants, according to self-styled “liberals.”
So let’s have more wars. That’ll make liberals feel good about themselves, and that’s what we want, right?
If the wars stopped, lots of potential immigrants would stay where they are. They wouldn’t come to the West. That would make liberals depressed. We can’t have that.
I would suggest we’re looking at the Hillary Clinton formula: love war, wage war, and thus bring more glorious immigrants to our shores. Just a thought.
The whole point of our society these days is people feeling virtuous, and signaling each other about their mutual virtuousness. We must cater to these folk. They are the beautiful ones.
They place their own heartfelt goodness on the highest pedestal. There must be NO analysis of the cost of immigration. There must be NO ceiling on immigration. There must be no assessment of the crimes committed by immigrants. Facts and figures and limits are heartless and cruel and elitist.
LET EVERYONE IN.
No borders, no nations, no deportations.
Somehow, some way, this will lead to utopia.
How exactly? That’s a secret. But don’t worry. It’ll come to pass.
Who knows? We may have to destroy the village in order to save it.
And all those immigrants who aren’t migrating to the West because of wars? The ones who are coming for the free government goodies? The ones who refuse to accept the traditions and laws of the country they’re entering? The ones who hate the countries they’re entering and prove it by committing heinous crimes? That’s not really a problem. With enough love from the “liberals,” they will be transformed in time. And even if they aren’t, that’s all right, because in their own way they’ll be breaking down the gross evil called “sovereign nations”—which we all know is code for Nazism. Nothing should be sovereign. Borders are artificial. They’re just lines on a map. What a scintillating insight! (Most college students these days are enlightened by this staggering revelation, aren’t they?)
I say: worship the Pentagon. Worship the military industrial complex. They find ingenious ways to launch wars. Therefore, they help bring more immigrants here. They do their part. They give us the chance to show our humanitarian soul.
War is God’s plan to allow us to be virtuous.
War is the universe saying, “Let your love shine through.”
Everything happens for a reason.
Let us launch the Church of War.
The Church will teach us we are one planet without nations.
Finally, we will have peace.
And then we can build a memorial to the recently deceased David Rockefeller, who knew all along that peace through war would lead to one global governance system with no nations, no borders, no exclusions:
Everyone laboring under the same sun. Everyone fitting into a predetermined slot, ridding us of the scourge called freedom. Everyone cooperating in the new civilization. Everyone saving everyone.
We will triumph as One Glob, indivisible.
All along, the impulse for war has been persistent; difficult if not impossible to eradicate.
Now, finally, we know why.
It was a great Good, masquerading as Evil.
…those who are obsessed with appearing to do good must have victims they can help; if there aren’t enough victims—create them.
Be a war monger who preaches peace and unity.
IF YOU’RE IN THE ARMED FORCES AND YOU’RE VERY LUCKY, YOU MIGHT PARTICIPATE IN AN ATTACK, AN INVASION, A WAR THAT WILL DISLOCATE HUGE NUMBERS OF DESPERATE CIVILIANS. SOME OF THEM WILL EMIGRATE HERE, WHERE OUR OWN CITIZENS FERVENTLY WISH TO DO GOOD AND HELP THEM. YOU WILL ENABLE OUR CITIZENS IN THEIR QUEST TO PROVE THEMSELVES VIRTUOUS. THEY WILL GIVE SANCTUARY TO THE IMMIGRANTS YOU DISPLACED.
It all works out, doesn’t it?
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
I hope you are being sarcastic. Yesterday you had an article on logic and I find very little logic here. It is a bunch of assumptions. I and a lot of my friends are liberal. None of them want war and especially more war so we will have more immigrants. Everyone I know wants to vet immigrants and have criteria. What Trump is doing is not working though.
Wake up, gbsk! There is a reason that Jon posted this article on this blog, rather than his “NoMoreFakeNews” blog. Are you able to discern the difference?
This blog is called “Outside the Reality Machine” because it is all about seeing things from a very, very different perspective. Perhaps you voted for Gary Johnson who famously asked on national TV, “What is Aleppo?” Or for Hillary, who screamed on the Senate floor while being questioned about the attacks at Benghazi, “What difference does it make?”
These things make a big difference, because when it comes to war and foreign affairs, we need to evaluate the evidence, and not just accept the assurances of leaders. Does it really make sense to supply arms and support and rhetoric and money to topple foreign regimes, then bring their refugees halfway around the globe to live in a culture that is totally unfamiliar to them? Is that an act of kindness? Trump has already reached agreements with nearby countries to take care of these refugees, close to their home country, with a more familiar culture. This is a more sane way to do things.
More food for thought on evaluating the evidence rather than accepting the talking points of the media and the Washington spin machine:
Let’s take a step back. Nowhere in this essay does it directly say “liberals consciously desire war.” It’s lampooning the insane contradiction in reasoning that has emerged from the simultaneous deployment pro-immigration and war on terror propaganda.
I’m disgusted by this meme of refugee worship where everyone wants to help those displaced but no one even gives half a thought about stopping these conflicts. No one asks the questions like:”Why did this war REALLY happen? Who is funding these people? How are they getting weapons, tanks, supplies, etc.? How does ISIS sell their Oil? What is the USA actually doing there? Why is ISIS allowed to operate on twitter while the “alt-right” is censored?”
There’s about 1 sentence said for addressing the real issues driving mass immigration like CIA-backed Drug Cartels, CIA-backed terrorists, poverty, corrupt regimes, etc. for each page of vitriolic immigration debate. It seems like no one cares about actually improving the situation for people, instead those indoctrinated on the left like to “virtue signal” with pseudo-assistance by making a whole new class of people dependent on the US government for survival and those indoctrinated on the right want to isolate themselves in a castle while the CIA, Neo-cons and their globalist pimps run rough-shod over the rest of the world.
Jon is casting a humorous light at the illogical “golden middle” between these two worldviews that we presently find ourselves living in.
Sounds about right Jon!
“Mein Führer, I can walk!”
Straw Man Fallacy – “self styled liberals” sounds more like Rappaport undefined Liberals, blamed
for most enabling and enacting of devastating conflicts for the dual and conflicting purposes of
idealistically ‘helping’ displaced immigrants survive and thereby creating a Fascist Society,
presumably with requisite death camps, to exterminate said survivors [to make room for new exploits?].
I submit, Aristotle would find Jon’s argument far askew the Square of Opposition, as he knew
the power structure behind the enabling and enactment of such devastation and its motivations,
are only politically aligned by requirements of the current subject crisis, I.e. Obama yesterday,
Trump today. Seems to me so far, Trump’s developing, defining Crises, have the potential to
outstrip Obama’s legacy in quantity and severity, and many of his choices, would make him a
fine candidate as fuhrer of these disunited states, the torture and death camps are already in
Which begs the logical: Is Trump the most dangerous self styled Liberal? Heil the Donald!
Donald Trump Reads The Snake Lyric At Campaign Rally Referring To Immigration | Jan.12th 2016
Thank you, Jon! Not only have the masses lost the ability to think logically, but they also have lost the ability to imagine, or listen to someone who is imagining, different pictures of what we call reality that offer a greater perspective. Not only that, but there is no longer any sense of humor, dark or otherwise, remaining in the leftist view of the world, because everything is analyzed only in terms of whether or not it “triggers” someone’s ridiculously subjective viewpoint of the moment, or the “party line.” But even more to the point, who wants the truth, anyway?
I can’t recall who made the following observation, but it is apropos:
Where was the moral outrage when the United States was bombing the living crap out of these defenseless countries? The logic-gap is at times mind boggling.